PPsychology.com

Theories / How behavior is learned

Social learning theory

Most of what a person can do was never taught to them directly and never rewarded. They watched somebody else do it first. Albert Bandura spent a career working out how that happens.

Published November 4, 2026. 5 sources at the foot of the page.

What it says

Classical and operant conditioning both ask what happened to you. Social learning theory asks what you saw happen to somebody else. A person can pick up a behavior by watching a model, before they have ever tried it.

Bandura broke the copying into four processes, and all four have to run. That is why watching is not the same as learning. A learner who was not paying attention, or cannot remember, or cannot yet move that way, reproduces nothing.

Reinforcement still matters in this account, but it can arrive secondhand. Seeing a model rewarded makes the behavior more likely in the watcher, and seeing a model punished makes it less likely. That is vicarious reinforcement, and it separates what somebody has learned from what they choose to do.

Bandura later widened the theory and renamed it social cognitive theory. The part of it most used today is self-efficacy: a person's belief about whether they can do a particular thing. It predicts whether they try, and how long they keep at it.

The four processes

All four have to run before a behavior somebody watched becomes one they can perform.

  1. Attention

    The learner has to notice the model. One who is liked, familiar or similar to the learner gets more of it.

  2. Retention

    What was seen has to be held in memory, usually as words or an image that can be brought back later.

  3. Reproduction

    The learner has to be able to perform the acts. Watching a concert pianist does not give you the hands.

  4. Motivation

    Something has to make the behavior worth doing, including whatever the learner saw happen to the model.

Where it came from

The theory grew out of the imitation studies Bandura ran at Stanford in the early 1960s, the Bobo doll work among them. The book called Social Learning Theory appeared in 1977, and the fuller account in 1986.

It was written against the behaviorism of the time, which explained learning by what happened to the learner. Bandura kept the reinforcement and put a thinking person back in the middle of it, which is why the later name is social cognitive theory.

What holds up, and what does not

Observational learning itself is not in doubt. It is measured in children, in adults and in other animals, and it is the basis of modeling in training of every kind, from surgery to sport.

Self-efficacy has held up as a predictor. Across a large body of work, how confident somebody is that they can do a specific thing forecasts whether they persist at it. The weaker part of the theory is its breadth. Four processes named in words are hard to disprove, and the theory says what to look at rather than how much of each to expect. Where it has been turned into something measurable, as self-efficacy was, the evidence is much better than where it has not.

What it does not mean

It does not say people are copies of what is around them. The four processes include a choice, and vicarious reinforcement changes what a person does without changing what they know. It also does not say that watching a behavior on a screen produces it. That is a separate question, with its own and much weaker evidence.

Check yourself

Three questions on what is above. Each answer says why.

  1. Pick the statement that describes vicarious reinforcement.

    1. A reward given to the learner after the behavior
    2. A reward the learner sees arrive for somebody else
    3. A behavior that repeats with no reward at all
    Show the answer

    Answer: B. Vicarious reinforcement is the consequence a watcher sees land on the model. It changes what the watcher does, with nothing happening to the watcher.

  2. A learner watched the whole demonstration, remembers it well and wants to do it, but cannot yet move that fast. Which process is missing?

    1. Reproduction, the third
    2. Attention, the first
    3. Retention, the second
    Show the answer

    Answer: A. Reproduction is being able to perform the acts. All four processes have to run, so one missing piece is enough to stop the copying.

  3. What does self-efficacy refer to in Bandura's later work?

    1. How much a person likes the model
    2. A person's belief that they can do a particular thing
    3. How often a behavior has been rewarded
    Show the answer

    Answer: B. Self-efficacy is a judgment about your own capability for one task, and it predicts whether a person tries and whether they keep trying.

Sources

  1. Bandura, A., Ross, D., and Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3).
  2. Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models' reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(6).
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall.
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman.

Practice it on Learn

Learn teaches the consequence half of this: Reinforcement and punishment, in the Understand people track, on what relief and reward do to a behavior.

Practice negative reinforcementSee what Learn is

Every lesson is free. Plus is optional. For adults 18 and over.

More theories